COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MODERN INSTRUMENTATION AND MONITORING METHODS FOR ASSESSING THE TECHNICAL CONDITION OF MULTI-STOREY BUILDINGS
Keywords:
technical condition assessment, structural health monitoring, natural vibration frequency, accelerometer, seismometer, digitization, sampling rate.Abstract
The article examines modern approaches to assessing the technical condition of buildings and structures and to the continuous monitoring of their structural systems. First, the distinction between technical condition assessment and continuous monitoring is clarified; then the instruments used to determine the dynamic characteristics of a structure - its natural frequency and period of vibration - are compared, ranging from the mechanical rebound hammer to digital accelerometers and seismometers. The article also shows the stages through which inspection methods have evolved, from visual inspection to integrated systems based on artificial intelligence, and separately substantiates the requirement for the sampling rate in digital signal recording.
References
1. Urban Planning Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. - Tashkent, 2019. (in Uzbek)
2. QMQ 2.01.03-19. Construction in seismic regions. - Tashkent: Davarxitektqurilish, 2019. (in Uzbek)
3. Clough R.W., Penzien J. Dynamics of Structures. - 3rd ed. - Berkeley: Computers & Structures, 2003.
4. Chopra A.K. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. - 5th ed. - Pearson, 2016.
5. Farrar C.R., Worden K. Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective. - Wiley, 2013.
6. Boller C., Chang F.-K., Fujino Y. Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring. - Wiley, 2009.
