SHAHAR YASHIL HUDUDLARINING UZLUKSIZLIGINI TA’MINLASHDA EKOLOGIK YO‘LAKLARNI REJALASHTIRISH
Keywords:
ekologik yo‘lak, yashil infratuzilma, shaharsozlik, landshaft bog‘langanligi, yashil hududlar, geografik axborot tizimi.ekologik yo‘lak, yashil infratuzilma, shaharsozlik, landshaft bog‘langanligi, yashil hududlar, geografik axborot tizimi.Abstract
Maqolada shahar yashil hududlari orasidagi uzilishlarni kamaytirish uchun ekologik yo‘laklarni rejalashtirish yondashuvi ishlab chiqiladi. Yashil hududlarning fazoviy tutashligi, biologik bog‘langanligi va aholining ulardan foydalanish imkoniyati alohida baholash yo‘nalishlari sifatida ajratildi. Natijada maqsadni belgilash, tayanch hududlarni xaritalash, to‘siqlarni aniqlash, muqobil yo‘nalishlarni solishtirish, loyiha va boshqaruvni muvofiqlashtirish hamda monitoringdan iborat olti bosqichli rejalashtirish tartibi taklif etildi. Yo‘laklarni baholash uchun yashash muhiti, bog‘langanlik, to‘siqlar, foydalanish imkoniyati, mikroiqlim va parvarish mezonlari tizimlashtirildi. Farg‘ona shahrida yondashuvni qo‘llash uchun zarur ma’lumotlar va loyihaoldi tekshiruvlar belgilandi.References
1. Forman R. T. T. Urban Ecology: Science of Cities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139030472.
2. Benedict M. A., McMahon E. T. Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2006. DOI: 10.2307/jj.41379772.
3. Ahern J. Greenways as a planning strategy // Landscape and Urban Planning. 1995. Vol. 33, No. 1–3. P. 131–155. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2046(95)02039-V.
4. Urban D., Keitt T. Landscape connectivity: A graph-theoretic perspective // Ecology. 2001. Vol. 82, No. 5. P. 1205–1218. Universitet repozitoriysi: https://scholars.duke.edu/publication/688262.
5. Ahern J. F. Greenways as strategic landscape planning: theory and application. PhD dissertation. Wageningen: Wageningen University, 2002. 183 p. DOI: 10.18174/163021.
6. Ersoy E. An Integrated Approach to Enhancing Ecological Connectivity and Accessibility in Urban Areas: a case study of Sheffield, UK. PhD thesis. University of Sheffield, 2015. Repozitoriy: https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/10552/.
7. Gilbert-Norton L., Wilson R., Stevens J. R., Beard K. H. A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness // Conservation Biology. 2010. Vol. 24, No. 3. P. 660–668. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01450.x.
8. Beninde J., Veith M., Hochkirch A. Biodiversity in cities needs space: a meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation // Ecology Letters. 2015. Vol. 18, No. 6. P. 581–592. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12427.
9. Saura S., Pascual-Hortal L. A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: Comparison with existing indices and application to a case study // Landscape and Urban Planning. 2007. Vol. 83, No. 2–3. P. 91–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.005.
10. McRae B. H., Dickson B. G., Keitt T. H., Shah V. B. Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation // Ecology. 2008. Vol. 89, No. 10. P. 2712–2724. DOI: 10.1890/07-1861.1.
11. Massarelli C. Developing a Calculation Workflow for Designing and Monitoring Urban Ecological Corridors: A Case Study // Urban Science. 2024. Vol. 8, No. 4. Article 169. DOI: 10.3390/urbansci8040169.
12. Bowler D. E., Buyung-Ali L., Knight T. M., Pullin A. S. Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence // Landscape and Urban Planning. 2010. Vol. 97, No. 3. P. 147–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006.
1. Forman R. T. T. Urban Ecology: Science of Cities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139030472.
2. Benedict M. A., McMahon E. T. Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2006. DOI: 10.2307/jj.41379772.
3. Ahern J. Greenways as a planning strategy // Landscape and Urban Planning. 1995. Vol. 33, No. 1–3. P. 131–155. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2046(95)02039-V.
4. Urban D., Keitt T. Landscape connectivity: A graph-theoretic perspective // Ecology. 2001. Vol. 82, No. 5. P. 1205–1218. Universitet repozitoriysi: https://scholars.duke.edu/publication/688262.
5. Ahern J. F. Greenways as strategic landscape planning: theory and application. PhD dissertation. Wageningen: Wageningen University, 2002. 183 p. DOI: 10.18174/163021.
6. Ersoy E. An Integrated Approach to Enhancing Ecological Connectivity and Accessibility in Urban Areas: a case study of Sheffield, UK. PhD thesis. University of Sheffield, 2015. Repozitoriy: https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/10552/.
7. Gilbert-Norton L., Wilson R., Stevens J. R., Beard K. H. A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness // Conservation Biology. 2010. Vol. 24, No. 3. P. 660–668. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01450.x.
8. Beninde J., Veith M., Hochkirch A. Biodiversity in cities needs space: a meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation // Ecology Letters. 2015. Vol. 18, No. 6. P. 581–592. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12427.
9. Saura S., Pascual-Hortal L. A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: Comparison with existing indices and application to a case study // Landscape and Urban Planning. 2007. Vol. 83, No. 2–3. P. 91–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.005.
10. McRae B. H., Dickson B. G., Keitt T. H., Shah V. B. Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation // Ecology. 2008. Vol. 89, No. 10. P. 2712–2724. DOI: 10.1890/07-1861.1.
11. Massarelli C. Developing a Calculation Workflow for Designing and Monitoring Urban Ecological Corridors: A Case Study // Urban Science. 2024. Vol. 8, No. 4. Article 169. DOI: 10.3390/urbansci8040169.
12. Bowler D. E., Buyung-Ali L., Knight T. M., Pullin A. S. Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence // Landscape and Urban Planning. 2010. Vol. 97, No. 3. P. 147–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006.
