YUQORI QAVATLI TURAR-JOY BINOLARIDA IJTIMOIY QULAYLIKNI TA’MINLASH OMILLARI VA YASHASH SIFATINING MEZONLARI

Authors

  • Madumarova Marg‘ubaxon Maxkamboy qizi Toshkent arxitektura va qurilish universiteti, PhD izlanuvchisi, Andijon davlat texnika instituti qurilish muhandisligi va elektroenergetika fakulteti “Qurilish muhandisligi va arxitektura” kafedrasi o‘qituvchisi, Author

Keywords:

yuqori qavatli turar-joy binolari, ijtimoiy qulaylik, yashash sifati, qulaylik mezonlari, xonadon tipologiyasi, Andijon viloyati

Abstract

Mazkur maqolada yuqori qavatli turar-joy binolarida ijtimoiy qulaylikni ta’minlovchi omillar tahlil qilinadi hamda yashash sifatini baholash mezonlari tizimi ishlab chiqiladi. Tadqiqotda tizimli tahlil, qiyosiy-mezoniy baholash va dizayn-loyihani funksional-texnologik tahlil qilish usullari qo‘llaniladi; mezonlar ilmiy adabiyotlar va me’yoriy hujjatlar umumlashtirilib, kontent-tahlil orqali shakllantiriladi. Natijada yashash sifatining funksional, mikroiqlim-ekologik, ijtimoiy-psixologik, xavfsizlik va iqtisodiy mezonlari guruhlari aniqlanadi va Andijon viloyati sharoitida mo‘ljallangan 17 qavatli turar-joy binosi loyihasi misolida baholanadi. Muhokama jarayonida mezonlar tizimining mavjud yondashuvlardan farqi, amaliy tavsiyalar va kelgusi tadqiqot yo‘nalishlari yoritiladi.

References

[1] Gifford, R. The Consequences of Living in High-Rise Buildings // Architectural Science Review. 2007. Vol. 50, No. 1. P. 2–17.

[2] Yuen, B., Yeh, A. G. O., Appold, S. J., Earl, G., Ting, J., Kurnianingrum Kwee, L. High-rise Living in Singapore Public Housing // Urban Studies. 2006. Vol. 43, No. 3. P. 583–600.

[3] Amerigo, M., Aragonés, J. I. A Theoretical and Methodological Approach to the Study of Residential Satisfaction // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1997. Vol. 17, No. 1. P. 47–57.

[4] Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., Zelson, M. Stress Recovery during Exposure to Natural and Urban Environments // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1991. Vol. 11, No. 3. P. 201–230.

[5] Wong, N. H., Tan, A. Y. K., Chen, Y., Sekar, K., Tan, P. Y., Chan, D., Chiang, K., Wong, N. C. Thermal Evaluation of Vertical Greenery Systems for Building Walls // Building and Environment. 2010. Vol. 45, No. 3. P. 663–672.

[6] Pérez, G., Rincón, L., Vila, A., González, J. M., Cabeza, L. F. Vertical Greenery Systems (VGS) for Energy Saving in Buildings: A Review // Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014. Vol. 39. P. 139–165.

[7] Kontoleon, K. J., Eumorfopoulou, E. A. The Effect of the Orientation and Proportion of a Plant-Covered Wall Layer on the Thermal Performance of a Building Zone // Building and Environment. 2010. Vol. 45, No. 5. P. 1287–1303.

[8] Newman, O. Defensible Space: Crime Prevention through Urban Design. New York: Macmillan, 1972. 264 p.

[9] ISO 7730: Ergonomics of the thermal environment — Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices. Geneva: ISO, 2005.

[10] O‘zRQ 2.01.03-19. Qurilishda seysmik qurilish qoidalari. T.: O‘zstandart, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-24